Cleric Doubles Down on Muslim-Muslim Ticket Advocacy Despite National Backlash

Author Avatar

latestnews

Joined: Aug 2026

The Controversy Unfolds

Sheikh Sani Yahaya Jingir, a prominent Islamic leader and the National Chairman of Jama’atu Izalatil Bid’a Wa’ikamatis Sunnah (JIBWIS), has publicly reaffirmed his unwavering support for the Muslim-Muslim political arrangement. Following a surge of intense criticism sparked by a viral video from an event in Kano State, the cleric has dismissed calls for an apology, insisting that his stance is a matter of political preference protected by constitutional rights.

Reframing the Debate

During the controversial appearance, Jingir praised the administration of President Bola Tinubu for pioneering the same-faith ticket in the 2023 elections. The Sheikh explicitly called for the continuation of this strategy in future electoral cycles, specifically looking toward 2027. He characterized the arrangement not as a religious mandate, but as a strategic political coalition, stating, ‘I have no regrets. A Muslim-Muslim ticket is a political arrangement, not a religious achievement.’

Addressing the Critics

In his rebuttal to the public outcry, the cleric challenged the narrative that his advocacy constitutes an attack on national unity. He questioned the legitimacy of the backlash, asking why his support for a specific political configuration would be deemed offensive when other groups are equally free to campaign for their own interests. Addressing those he referred to as his detractors, he remarked, ‘Have I done anything wrong by merely campaigning for a Muslim-Muslim ticket? Have I stopped the Christians from their own slogans?’

Concerns Over Religious Harmony

The intensity of the Sheikh’s rhetoric has drawn sharp condemnation from various quarters. Prominent public figures and social media activists, including Femi Fani-Kayode and Deji Adeyanju, have voiced significant concerns, warning that such polarizing language risks inflaming religious tensions in a country as diverse as Nigeria. Critics argue that:

  • Divisive political rhetoric can deepen existing fault lines between religious groups.
  • Statements advocating for religious dominance in government positions undermine the principle of inclusivity.
  • The potential for social instability increases when religious leaders interject their influence into partisan politics in this manner.

Despite the chorus of disapproval from civil society and other political commentators, Sheikh Jingir maintains that his position is rooted in his right to free speech. As the conversation surrounding political representation continues to evolve, this incident underscores the ongoing friction between religious expression and national political identity in Nigeria.

Leave your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *